|
WSJ: Multinationals in U.S. May See Profit Fall
This is something I've been highlighting for quite a while, as the offset to the rejoicing of the "stronger dollar" - throughout the winter I was showing how multinationals were goosing earnings (revenue) not through organic growth but in large part just through a weak U.S. dollar. Now, we are only back to levels on the dollar seen in the spring and it's been a nearly decade bear market so it's all relative. But when your "14% growth" is "9% currency" and "5% reality" - it is going to look ugly for some of these companies once the tailwind goes away. The ability to "surprise" to the upside is going to be much more difficult in the coming quarters if the dollar stays where it is, or strengthens further. Multinational companies in the U.S. that are accustomed to the tailwind of a weakening dollar are about to find out what it is like to sail in currency doldrums. For much of the past six years, and particularly in the past two quarters, the dollar's infirmity has helped pump up the results of U.S. companies with operations abroad. That is because revenues earned in other currencies have converted back into more dollars. Against the euro, for instance, the dollar has lost ground compared with a year earlier for eight quarters in a row. Now the currency tides are shifting. That means what had been a bonus for companies is rapidly turning into a burden, producing a jolt for investors. Some of the foreign sales volumes that would have translated better into dollars "will go from a major tailwind to no wind whatsoever, to potentially a headwind," says Tobias Levkovich, chief U.S. equity strategist at Citigroup. A glance at recent earnings reports shows the extent of the boost. Toy maker Mattel Inc. reported that out of an 11% rise in sales in the second quarter over the prior year, five percentage points came from favorable currency moves. Tech company Hewlett-Packard Co. said half of its 10% rise in sales was attributable to currency shifts in the quarter to the end of July. At fast-food company McDonald's Corp., revenue actually would have fallen 2% in the second quarter of 2008 over a year earlier if the impact of currency translation were excluded. With the currency bump, however, revenue increased 4% in that period. Currencies also contributed almost a quarter of the improvement in earnings per share. Although most companies employ strategies to reduce the impact of currency fluctuations on the results, "we expect recent dollar strength (if sustained) to pressure revenues and earnings growth" across the information-technology and hardware sector, wrote analysts from Deutsche Bank last month. Currency gains have been "a nice plus" and a "positive influence on the bottom line," says Tim Pistell, chief financial officer at Parker Hannifin Corp., a $12 billion industrial-equipment company based in Cleveland that gets more than half of its business from outside the U.S. Exchange rates produced five percentage points of the 13% growth in the company's sales in the year to the end of June -- or more than a third of the sales growth. In a broader sense, the dollar is still a source of competitiveness for U.S. companies that export products overseas. The dollar's recent rally, while powerful, has made only a small dent in its six-year fall. By many measures, the currency remains weak. Of course, gauging the impact of currency moves on the bottom line is complex, because they affect both sales and costs. For companies that receive a large chunk of their revenues from overseas but buy raw materials at home, a strengthening dollar is far from ideal. That is because it cuts into revenue growth but wouldn't affect costs. For companies that match up revenues and costs on a geographic basis, meaning their foreign operations use homemade material, not imports from the U.S., it is less worrisome. Although a stronger dollar would bring down foreign revenues, it also would lower costs, a phenomenon often called natural hedging. by Trader Mark (Fund my Mutual Fund) Disclaimer: Please note that charts and commentary provided by the moderator are for educational purposes only. Any trades placed upon reliance on the moderator’s charts or information is taken at your own risk for your own account. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. While there is great potential for reward trading stocks, futures and options, there is also substantial risk of loss and you must decide your own suitability to trade. Future trading results can never be guaranteed. This is not an offer to buy or sell stock, futures, options or commodity interests. Most trading systems are based on historical formulas which have worked in the past. However, what has happened before may or may not happen again. You can lose all your money trading stocks, futures, and options and you must decide your own suitability as to whether or not to trade. Only trade with true risk capital you can afford to lose. Only trade markets you can properly afford to trade. Properly funded trading accounts typically perform better than those that are not. Never risk more than 2-3% of your account on any one trade. Always define your risk before entering a trade and place a stop to limit your risk. There are no guarantees or certainties in trading. Trading involves hard work, risk, discipline and the ability to follow rules and trade through any tough periods during a system’s draw downs. If you are looking for a guarantee, trading is probably not for you. Most people lose money trading. One of the reasons is that they lack discipline and are unable to be consistent. A system can help you become consistent. Ironically, worrying about the monetary aspect of trading can contribute to and cause a trader to make trading errors. Therefore, it is important to only trade with true risk capital. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|