Swing Trading Strategies & Stock Picks Since 2003



Watch Trading Videos for FREE now!
draw trend
You Are Here: Home > Articles > Commentary > XLF and SKF Both Negative Year to Date

XLF and SKF Both Negative Year to Date
Rating: -
Mar 25, 2009

Picture

Corey Rosenbloom

add Afraid to Trade
More articles
Font Size:
Text size
Text size
Text size

You might ask “How can that be possible?”  The XLF Financial ETF is down roughly 30% year to date, but the SKF (as of March 24), which is the double inverse (short) leveraged Financial ETF… which you would think would also be up 60%… is also negative:  down 3%.

Let’s see the performance year-to-date up to Tuesday, March 24, 2009:

The SKF actually was negative 10% on March 23 year-to-date while the XLF was down 24%.

Today’s market fall is likely to take the SKF positive for the year, but even that is begging the assumption most newer traders have that the SKF returns two-times (inverse) the XLF performance.

I’m on a campaign here to inform newer traders (and even experienced traders with little experience in inverse funds) to look very closely at double (and inverse) funds - particularly to avoid using them as long-term hedges and/or position trading vehicles.  Use them as short-term “supercharges” to day and week-long (at the most) swing trades.

Again, among other reasons (the way the fund is structured, etc), double funds suffer from the ‘drawdown’ phenomena, where, to get back to break-even after a loss, it takes a larger percentage to return to where you were.

Forget the leveraged component for a moment.

If you have a $100,000 account and manage to lose 50% of that account, then you’re down to $50,000.

Now, to get your account back to ‘break-even’ at $100,000, you can’t expect a 50% return to do it for you.  50% of $50,000 is $25,000.  If you lose 50%, you actually need a 100% return ($50,000 of $50,000) to get you back to where you started.

This is the problem facing leveraged funds tied to underlying indexes or sectors.  Percentage-wise, the funds track moves short-term, but dollar-wise, they don’t because of this “drawdown/percentage” function.

Look very carefully at the implications of this, and stick to using leveraged funds as day-trading or short-term swing trading vehicles only.  Refer back to my post yesterday “You Can’t Stay Wrong for Long in SKF” for additional information.

Corey Rosenbloom
Afraid to Trade.com


Rate this article

 
 
(click to rate) 


XLF
C:14.7100

Rate XLF

 

(click to rate)


Back to top


You Are Here:Home > Articles > Commentary > XLF and SKF Both Negative Year to Date

BUY? SELL? HOLD?
Find out now.