People always email me "where do you get your ideas from"? Basically, I am an information junkie. I try to read as much as possible, from as many sources as possible. Some I agree with, some I do not - but I try to assimilate it, mix it, think about it... think about it more... and then come up with my short and long term views. I try to post (regurgitate) some of the most pertinent stories on the blog, but frankly probably 90% of it what I'm reading never makes it back here as I am trying to not make the site overwhelming. Anything more than 6 to 8 posts a day I think is too much, and even with that I am trying to segregate some of the "stock trades" information out from the main body of the blog - still working on that.
We have a hodge podge of readers with different interests - some are economic focused, some are general market focused, some are specific stock focused, and some are trading focused. Of course some people float in between multiple of those categories.
Something I used to do in parts of 2008 was lists of stories that might be of interest to readers that were (mostly) lengthier in nature. Go forward I am going to make a list for weekend reading on things I have been filtering through during the previous week through various news sources or other blogs. A lot of this stuff is what I bookmark during the week to "get back to later" or consider "adding to the blog" but never get around to it. I think *during* the week I keep readers busy enough - so we'll limit it just to once a week during "downtime".
p.s. breaking news - you cannot even rest on weekends in this day and age. Obama says he will be giving 4% fixed mortgage rates to "ANY" credit worthy human being. Rejoice! I say we should be paying people 4% a year for the pleasure to own a home... because owning a home is a God given right. And our federal government pockets are limitless... see how it works? your children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren subsidize the newly formed home owners of today.
Onward....
Bloomberg: Stiglitz Criticizes Bad Bank Plan as Swapping "Cash for Trash"
Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz said any decision by President Barack Obama to establish a so-called bad bank to rid financial companies of toxic assets risks swelling the national debt. That amounts to swapping taxpayers’ “cash for trash,” Stiglitz said in a panel discussion at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland today. “You shouldn’t chase good money after bad. We’re talking about a national debt that’s very hard to manage.”
Stiglitz, a professor at Columbia University in New York and a former adviser to President Bill Clinton, says the plan would leave taxpayers picking up the bill for years of excess lending by banks. It would also deprive the government of money that would have been better spent shoring up Social Security, he said.
************************************
Vanity Fair: Fannie Mae's Last Stand
Many believe the government-backed mortgage giants known as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were major culprits in the economic meltdown. But, for decades, Fannie Mae had been under siege from powerful enemies, who resented its privileged status, its hard-driving C.E.O.’s, and its huge profits. Surveying Fannie’s deeply dysfunctional relationships with Congress, the White House, and Wall Street, the author tells of the long, vicious war—involving most of Washington’s top players—that helped propel one of the world’s most successful companies off a cliff.
************************************
New York Magazine: Stock Surfing the Tsunami (i.e. the life of a daytrader in this crazy market)
Ordinary investors may flee the market’s dizzying ups and downs, but Peter Milman and his kind hang on tight while riding the giant waves of uncertainty. There’s nothing more exhilarating than to catch the perfect surge.
************************************
Paul Kedrosky: Walmart & Target are like the Ebola Virus - quite awesome visual graphic reprentations of their spread across the U.S. year after year.
************************************
Portfolio.com: The Future of Housing - Think Small
“The very future of how real estate is bought, sold, and financed is under tremendous pressure,” says veteran Florida real estate economist Lewis Goodkin. “There’s no question that the years ahead will be sharply different from years past.”
One of the biggest questions swirling in property circles these days is how a reeling real estate industry will reshape and redefine itself for the future. Few signs of a quick reversal of fortune exist, but a closer look at the future of the industry reveals important trends and, surprisingly, reasons for optimism.
************************************
UK Times Online: The 10 People Most Responsible for the Recession
The global financial crisis has evolved into a worldwide recession of epic proportions. Analysts fear the sudden slump which has followed the credit crunch could even rival the Great Depression of the early 1930s and lead to global stagnation. But who is responsible?
************************************
Fortune: New York - the Next Housing Bust?
The Masters of the Universe have been dethroned. Now the question is just how much Wall Street's meltdown is going to hurt the city of New York and, by extension, its high-priced housing market. Even in a city where $20 million townhouse listings don't raise an eyebrow, signs of trouble abound. Fourth quarter 2008 sales volume was down a whopping 40% from 2007 according to New York brokerage the Corcoran Group.
************************************
The Atlantic: The State Competition for Federal Funds
As the stimulus made its way through the House this week, there was a great deal of talk about the infrastructure component. "Shovel ready" infrastructure spending is supposed to hit a very sweet spot, letting us spend large amounts of money on things that will boost economic growth when we finally emerge from the recession.
At least as currently proposed, the states face some very rough ground and two enormous hurdles. First, they have to get their projects to the contract obligation stage within the very limited amounts of time allowed. Then they have to get over the second hurdle of project completion within a similarly limited time frame. They only get federal funds for a project if they successfully jump both hurdles--but both jumps have to be made with considerable government process baggage weighing down the competitors.
************************************
Reuters: General Mills Says More People are Eating at Home
General Mills Inc and other food makers are benefiting from a sharp rise in home cooking in the United States and to a lesser extent in Western Europe, the head of the U.S. company said on Saturday. "We are seeing some very interesting changes in consumer behavior as we plunge deeper into the recession," Chairman and Chief Executive Ken Powell told a panel at the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum.
(Stiglitz is one of my favorites - speaks his mind, and I agree with most of what he says. Just add him to the growing chorus)
Two or three years ago, around half of the $1 trillion spent by Americans each year on food went into the tills of restaurants and fast-food outlets. But the fashion for eating away from home -- a strongly growing feature of the U.S. marketplace for the past 35 years -- has now been thrown into reverse. "What we see now, over the last year and a half, is a very, very significant change in the direction of that trend," Powell said.
************************************